Marketing - Category

An honest conversation about social media wrap up.

Tweet this

image

Is Social Media Week over already? It went so fast, and we learned so much here at The Blog Studio. We’re just starting to process and make sense of it now. We’d like to take a second and send a heartfelt ‘Thanks’ to all of you who came out to our office for our ‘No Cheerleaders Allowed’ talk. We wanted an honest conversation about social media, and thanks to all of you, we really got one.

If you’ll indulge us for a moment, we’d like to take a quick stroll down memory lane and recap some of the interesting discussions we had that evening, and share what we learned for those of you who couldn’t make it in person. For those of you that braved the Canadian cold to squeeze into our offices, we commend your moxie!

The biggest lesson we learned is that social media means something different to everyone. Everyone in the room had a different opinion on what social media is, how you can use it personally or for business, and what works and what doesn’t. This make a whole lot of sense, because the one thing everyone agreed on is that social media is powered by the individual behind the keyboard. So to all the ‘experts; out there trying to define social media, you’re being shouted down by the rabble. There is no solid definition that everyone in the industry feels comfortable with.

We started the conversation off by asking everyone to discuss the early experiences they had with the web, and with social media. I got the ball rolling discussing how I miss the days where social media was a free for all, and everyone shared their ideas free of charge. Maybe this is a bit of nostalgia, but it still holds true for. Early memories in the room ranged from telnet to Twitter, and I quickly realized the age of people in the room started in the early 20’s and went all the way to people in their 50’s. How cool is that? Social media crushed the age barrier. It isn’t just for young tech savvy whippersnappers.

The hot button topic of the night was definitely using social media to make a buck. Is it OK to do this for profit? The answers ranged from absolutely to absolutely not. Fair enough. The consensus seemed to be we all want to make a living, but it can be very difficult to quantify ROI on social media campaigns. It’s great to hear that people really want to show their clients and employers they can demonstrate real value with social media, and hopefully prove it.

A thorough discussion of tools and analytics followed, and again the room was split. Many of you felt you can use analytics to show success with the numbers. A second camp felt that while numbers are important, you can’t always quantify the intangible way that people view yourself, or your business in the social media world. Personally, I agree with both points of view. In a perfect world a combination of analytics and conversation is able to tell the whole story. That isn’t an easy concept to explain, but we’re trying, and as time goes on we’re getting better at making our case.

This brought up the idea of whether it’s more valuable to target a select group of people on the web, or get your message out to everyone and see what sticks. Here’s one point where just about everyone in the room agreed: the targeted approach is the way to go.  Speaking to your specific audience, in the space where they live, generates the best results and the most clear communications. This is genuine two way engagement. The ‘scatter gun’ approach is headed out the door with the old media world, because it gets in the way of having a real conversation.

This led to a discussion about where people live and hang out online. We all agree that fewer and fewer people are watching television, at a set time, on an actual television. More commonly, viewers are tuning into their favorite shows online. This has a huge impact on the way we buy and consume advertising, or what even constitutes advertising anymore. While online viewing hasn’t eclipsed traditional TV watching yet, it’s coming.

Our favorite loudmouth American at The Blog Studio, Michael Dolan, turned a few heads when he said “Everyone who watches TV will be dead in a few years anyway.” That’s one way to put it. Maybe a more optimistic way to look at it, is you can get great bang for your buck by participating in TV online, either through ads or social media conversations around these shows.

Mr. Dolan gave a quick rundown of one his favorite topics: Social Media Trainwrecks. We discussed the Saatchi and Saatchi Toyota social media campaign, The Motrin Moms Debacle and the Steve Rubel Wal-Mart bloggers screwup. All interesting cases with a lot to teach anyone who gets involved in this space. The takeaway here is to enter at your own risk and be certain to keep things honest. Your audience is as smart as you are, don’t forget that.

The discussion continued with people and brands who are honest, and using social media in a fun and transparent way. Shaq, PDiddy and BlogTO were three names that popped up right away. I agree. They all do it well, keep it honest and make it fun. They also engage with their audiences and don’t use social media as a way to blast out ads.

The last part of the evening focused on Facebook, and opinions were all over the place. Some people love it, some people hate it. That’s the only honest assessment I can give of this discussion. Every person had a wholly different opinion. Some thought it was the future of online engagement, and some thought it’s already seen its’ day. The line of the night came out of this conversation, courtesy of Meghan Warbly of Argyle, “Facebook is the Nickelback of Social Media.” Ha.

We really had a great time, and were extremely impressed with the wide range of opinions and backgrounds that all came together in one room for a smart and civil conversation. That’s why the social media world is a such a great place. We’d like to take a second and thank all of you for coming and sharing with us. A few of you went far beyond the call of duty. Like Crystal Gibson, who shared her excellent great notes with us. Carolyn Van who showed up early to help us set up, and @tourdedufflet for bringing over some yummy dufflet treats.

It was lovely to meet some familiar Twitter avatars in the flesh like Toronto PR gadfly @J_Lab, @interpretivist and man about town @mynameisguygal. We also got a chance to play Smush. CA, and meet the brilliant minds at Atmosphere industries who thought it up.

Also a special thanks to Marijke Daye from Sweet Something Design for her awesome candy table that kept us all hopped up on sugar for our chat.

image

Thank you all for taking the time to visit, we’re looking forward to having you over for drinks again soon. 

Blogs, social media, and the President’s new digs

Tweet this

A few hours ago, a high priced consultant told a friend that blogs were a fad, and not worth the author’s time, and that websites built on blog platforms were kludgy inelegant poor cousins to more robust enterprise level CMS driven sites.

image

Two minutes later, I fired up whitehouse.gov, and nearly fell out of my chair laughing. Oh how I wish the order of those events was reversed. How I’d have loved to point out to this high priced nincompoop that the official website of the new president of the United States was by all appearances built on a blog platform. Not only is whitehouse.gov elegant and modern, but today it stood up to simply massive traffic.

That the official website of the president of the United States is built on a blog platform is a testament to the level of efficiency that can be achieved by using a modern blog platform

  • a trust in the security and stability of the platform
  • a thoroughly modern understanding of the web
  • a willingness of this administration to embrace social media
  • a willingness to engage the public

This heralds an even greater acceptance of blogs and social media into the mainstream. We in the social media world tend to forget just how big the knowledge gap is between us and the less techno-literate. The President’s new platform will expose a whole new audience to blogging in particular and social media in general.

Let’s take a moment to think about why the President’s team may have chosen to use an off-the-shelf blogging platform for whitehouse.gov. Given a relatively massive budget, why not go custom? I can think of a bunch of reasons:

  • Building on a blogging platform is much quicker. Most of the components of the site have already been built.
  • Most blogging platforms have hundreds if not thousands of pre-existing plugins to choose from. These can add functionality both immediately and over time as new features are invented.
  • The more popular blogging platforms have thousands of experts who can develop and support the systems.
  • Modern blogging systems are robust enterprise level content management systems. They feature caching mechanisms to withstand large traffic spikes, sophisticated search functionality, advanced categorization and tagging systems.
  • Built in support for RSS, email gathering, member profiles, ease of posting video and audio content.
  • Ease and low cost of administration. There’s no need to create specific help documentation – it already exists. Help for both administrators and users is usually just a few mouse clicks away.
  • Ease of use. Posting new items, editing existing items, reordering, re-categorization, and more are easy and fast.

Here in Toronto, ChangeCamp is running this Saturday January 24 2009. ChangeCamp

is a free participatory web-enabled face-to-face event that brings together citizens, technologists, designers, academics, policy wonks, political players, change-makers and government employees to answer one question: How do we re-imagine government and governance in the age of participation?


Most of us at The Blog Studio will be attending ChangeCamp . As active digital citizens, we’re keen to help shape the future. Looking into the past I’m reminded that we’ve been building non-blog websites on blogging platforms since 2004. It’s awfully nice to see the pioneering work we did reach such a level of acceptance. 

Experiments in SEO update

Tweet this

If you recall, late last week, I made a number of small changes to this site to see if I could gain back some of the google juice we recently lost. I think our drop in position is related to a decision I made to reduce the number of words on the site’s home page. I made some tweaks to the home page layout to accommodate longer post excerpts.

Five days have passed, so I thought I’d have a look at the search results to see if we’re ranking any higher for “blog design”. We are, but only by a single spot. However, looking at the cached versions of our site on Google, I see that the site hasn’t actually be indexed in about 6 days. So, the changes to the home page aren’t yet being reflected. Should be interesting to see what happens. As a side note, the search results for “blog design” are very volatile. I see a lot of change in the listings from day to day.

I’m chomping at the bit to try a couple of other SEO tweaks, but I’m trying to be smart about this by making one change at a time, so it’s effect can be measured.

Next up: waiting to see what effect the home page change has, then diving into meta description. Fun!

Experiments in SEO

Tweet this

For years, The Blog Studio has sat near the top of Google’s results for “blog design”. Not only was our home page keyword rich, but we had a ton of incoming links, and we’ve been doing this for longer than 95% of the rest of our little industry. Recently though, we’ve slipped off the first page.

I think the drop in position was timed with our redesign. One of my goals was to reduce the number of words on the home page. I wanted to let the video and the work speak for itself. In retrospect that might have been a bad decision. Looking at the folks who have taken over “our” position on the search results, the thing that is most obvious is that they have a LOT of written content on their home page. I’ve made some adjustments to the home page to lengthen the post excerpts, and rejigged the layout slightly.

As of today, we’re the 13th result for “blog design” on google. I’m going to give Google a few days to see if this change has any effect. I will, of course, report my findings!

Have you tried Crazy Egg?

Tweet this

Crazy Egg has been around for a while, but I’ve only just got around to trying it. I had trouble taking anything with such a silly name seriously, to my own chagrin.

Crazy Egg is a stats package unlike any other you’ve used. It offers a visual overview of your site activity, showing (amongst other things) the number of clicks per link on a page.

This is incredibly useful. It allows you to immediately grasp what your readers are doing. Are they clicking where you want? Are they reading your whole page? Is one graphic over powering another? Is your site doing what it’s supposed to do? The site itself says


What do the results tell me?

Where your visitors are clicking speaks for itself.

Here are just a few things you can discover:


  • Find the right spot for your ads

  • Find the right layout for a page

  • Find the right place to put everything


Crazy Egg’s admin interface is amongst the best in the business. It’s intuitive, powerful, and easy on the eyes. The actual software making the thing run is extremely impressive. The page updates happen using javascript, meaning there is very little refreshing of the web page you’re looking at. This gives the site more of a desktop application feel. Very slick.

Cost for the service ranges from $0 to $99/mo, depending on volume. Currently, I’m playing with the free account, but can see upgrading in the near future to access some of the more advanced features. If you’re interested in making sure your site is doing what you want it to do, I highly recommend checking Crazy Egg out. Now, if only they’d do something about that name…